Member of a planet's or star system's local military spacecraft force. Star Sailor Member of the federal spacecraft navy. Freefaller Soldier in the zero-gravity branch of the federal armed forces.
Going off of a very rough historical comparison to WW1 and earlier naval organizations try: The logistical support ships, cargo, colliers, oilers, etc. Some support vessels were never organized into units at all.
Assuming a techlevel more advanced than nearfuture i. If you are able to intercept and kill another warship across a star system, you are also capable of reducing to radioactive rubble an entire planetary civilization with little effort.
From Tobias Pfennings The brain trust that I copy from research for spacecraft combat material have developed their own private jargon. As a public service I present a small glossary so you decipher what they are talking about. Basically a mobile control center for combat drones.
Sort of like the brain center inside a huge swarm of deadly metal space-going hornets with nuclear stingers. The idea is that the control ship and its human crew stands off at a hopefully safe distance from the battle, and sending in hordes of expendable drones to savage the enemy ships.
Please note that the control ship probably will NOT carry and service the drones, since the control ship will have to be nimble enough beat a hasty retreat if the battle goes terribly wrong. The drones will be carried by separate parasite-carrier spacecraft.
The control ship might contain the only live human beings in the entire swarm. Since the acceleration of the projectile increases with the length of the weapon barrel, these tend to be in spinal mounts.
Requires large amounts of electricity advantage: They are basically huge numbers of dime-a-dozen chemical-rocket-powered kinetic-energy-weapons. It is such a good defense it could render torch missiles to be totally worthless.
Generally this is a preposterous waste of your combat dollar, unless there are special circumstances. Right off the bat the Lancer spacecraft will need at least four times the delta-V of an equivalent missile, since unlike the missile the Lancer is not on a suicide mission.
A missile just has to do one burn to the target.
The lancer has to burn for the target, do a counter-burn to stop, do a burn for home, and do a counter-burn to stop at home. Science fiction authors and game designers find this to result in scenarios that are drearily boring, so they often go out of their way to try to figure out extenuating circumstances to ensure military combat in their novels is non-Lanchesterian.
Occasionally the term is used for an impressively armed combat spacecraft suitable for political use in gunboat diplomacy. This poor term is used in a variety of conflicting ways in this website. Though all of definitions refer to something that is self-propelled, as opposed to railgun shells and other gun-launched kinetic energy weapons.
Since it is self-propelled, it does not require large amounts of electricity disadvantage: But each missile is an expensive precision crafted device containing its own fuel advantage: In standard military parlance, a "missile" is guided while a "rocket" is unguided.
Rick Robinson suggests that a "torpedo" is a missile with acceleration less than a spacecraft while a "missile" is a missile with acceleration greater than a spacecraft the same way a wet-navy battleship can dodge a sea-going torpedo but not a guided missile.
Technically a mothership that carries smaller vehicles internally is a parasite carrier Sometimes spelled "mother ship" or "mother-ship". The classic example is the Battlestar Galactica, a space-going fighter-aircraft carrier.
But science fiction has examples of huge battleships containing a few destroyer-sized ships. The classic example is parasite fighters housed inside a fighter-carrier, e. But science fiction has examples of parasite craft such as ship's boats, captain's yachts, cutters, and landing shuttles.
And the Death Star carried entire Star Destroyers.
The carrier can commonly recover and service the parasites, but not always. Essentially the weapon becomes the backbone or spine of the warship. The advantage is the ship has the biggest possible phallic symbol weapon.
Disadvantages include the difficulty supplying the monster with power, the ship savagely recoiling backward when you fire it, and having to turn the entire ship in order to aim it. Basically a cut-rate mothership that deals with larger rather than smaller ships. Examples from historical wet navies include destroyer tendersmotor torpedo boat tendersand submarine tenders.
They sprint to their target, but do not have the endurance for a prolonged chase. Torch missiles, on the other hand, are equipped with propulsion giving them acceleration and delta-V comparable to the target spacecraft they are trying to kill.
Which means if you do not kill the missile first, it will chase you all over entire the solar system. And it will eventually catch you because it is on a suicide mission and you are not.(ed note: This article was written in and is admittedly a little dated.
But most of it is still true.) The Third Industrial Revolution is going to create two areas of concern and interest to military planners in the next thirty to ﬁfty years. One of these is new technology that will create new problems of defense and military operations.
Arms Collectors' Reference Books **NEW ADDITION** THE GRENADE RECOGNITION MANUAL VOL 1- U.S. GRENADES & ACCESSORIES - By Darryl W. Lynn. This is a copy of the first edition with pages. A revised edition was completed in with pages currently available for $50 plus shipping from the author.
Corbett carefully details the sordid back story of today's "oiligarchy." While most people are well-acquainted with the Rockefeller name, few probably know the true history of . 1) Select and explain the most important turning points in WW1 between March and November I believe that there are three important turning points between March and November in the end of the war.
Get an answer for 'What were the major turning points of WW2?Please be specific, this may include a specific battle or leadership ' and find homework help for other History questions at eNotes.
Wwi A Turning Point In Modern History History Essay. Print Reference this. Disclaimer: to what extent was the First World War a turning point in modern history?
Presently, most historians conceptualize World War One as a crucial point in modern history. It was very important to them that they were actually supporting the war effort.